Link to Cagle's Questions page and index.
Link to Cagle's Parliamentary Procedure page.
Only one answer here: motions fail in case of a tie. You must have a majority for a motion to pass. That is why in some organizations the chair of a meeting can only vote in the case of a tie or to make a tie--that is, to preserve the general impartiality of the chair, the chair only votes when the vote makes a difference in the outcome.
After this motion fails, What if a motion to have the search completed April through August is made after the previous motion has failed and that vote is 3-3?
Yes.
Are we hopelessly deadlocked until someone switches sides.?
Again, yes, but perhaps not hopelessly. It calls for further
discussion. Such situations are difficult. Even if fifty votes are
taken, if they're all tied, then you still haven't passed a motion.
You might consult a lawyer regarding your state's laws concerning
school boards. Who would have authority to act in the event that the
matter took several months to decide? You'd have to appoint an interim
superintendent of some sort until the search was completed, but what if
that issue was also divided and tied?
In such situations there are no simple answers, unfortunately.
Having the chairman not vote is not an option. Any suggestions you can make will be much appreciated. Thanks.
Member of Franklin Special School District Board of Education, Franklin, Tennessee.
Return to Cagle's Questions page and index.
Link to Cagle's Parliamentary Procedure page.